Working on the material from my trip to Peru in February with L.A. Marzulli. I'm in his series of DVDs  titled WATCHERS, Watchers 5 and soon to be released 6.

IS BIGFOOT REAL? Finally, there may be answers to satisfy even the academic naysayers. In Februrary, 2013, it was my privilage to spend time with one of the main authorities on Bigfoot, or Sasquatch, or the Yeti, etc.. Ronald Morehead at: http://www.bigfootsounds.com was telling of a woman scientist who had Bigfoot DNA and would soon publish. A week later, stories about Dr. Ketchum's work began appearing on the web.

Just a few weeks before meeting Ron, another man told of seeing one over 8 ft tall in Texas. He observed it sitting on the ground  making vocal sounds until it apparently sensed him and walked away leaving a footprint in the mud almost 24 inches long.

Of the thousands of reports, four have been made to me personally that were very credible. More to come....

Noah's ark found or not?

Noah's ark discovered? It is definately up there. However, recent reports by a team of Chinese evangelicals is being disputed by a former associate who says it is a hoax. It may be, but we should reserve judgment. A guest speaker at our Independent Creation Association meeting this month April 13-14, 2010, told us that he had seen high rez photographs of the back of Noah's ark up on Mt. Ararat. This former Marine's testimony is credible.

Another speaker showed us that we are not running out of oil, something I was told by an old well driller 30 years ago. All of these energy and global warming scares are nothing but an attempt to justify more government control of us through increased taxes. Mr. Obama's US health care scare is nothing but a socialist take over of your money.

New missing link will soon go missing again.

ZZZZZ...man, another missing link?! Give it a few weeks and other scientists will put up a howll that the new South African cave skeleton is NOT a missing link.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/science/evolution/7550033/Missing-link-between-man-and-apes-found.html

The skeleton was found by Professor Lee Berger, from the University of the Witwatersrand, while exploring cave systems in the Sterkfontein region of South Africa, near Johannesburg, an area known as "the Cradle of Humanity".

Ardi is not a human ancestor

Just as with IDA, the monkey fossil from Germany of a few months ago, this little fragmentary fossil simian is hailed, on the one hand by some press-happy evolutionist as the MISSING link! And on the other, some iritated evolutionist is saying 'NO it is not'. At best they're stuck with the same "maybe" they started with. They don't have a missing link.

New Hadrosaur find

Tuesday, Sept. 23, 2009, we were collecting in southern Montana, when my digging buddie, Jordan Hall, found the largest hadrosaur footbone I have ever seen. For years we have offered a cast of a hind leg that was reported to be the largest known. It came from South Dakota. This new one looks to be 15% to 20% larger. Also, this Thursday, a long-time digging friend, Linda, sent a huge metatarsal from South Dakota that is the largest I had even seen. It was found this summer. We'll do some measurements and report on them.

These bones are fascinating in themselves, but, as a Creationist, it strikes me that, once again, the facts challenge the theories. The standard evolution line-up always shows animals going from small to large, as though that is the way evolution works. Well...what happened to the hadrosaurs? They're said to be extinct. But, it looks like from the facts of the fossil record, they were always huge. And bigger ones may be found yet. By the way, Hadrosaurs are very complex animals. There is nothing simple or "primitive" about them. Not to mention that several have been found with skin and internal organs in tact. They fail the little test, they fail the simple test and their mummies fail the millions of years test.

Possible New Triceratops

In July, I joined some digging buddies to help Otis Kline of the Glendive Dinosaur and Fossil Museum in Glendive, Montana finish the excavation of a large Triceratops. The vertebrae are 20 to 30 % larger than average. But the skull is odd. Based on the left squamosal, the nose horn and one brow horn and part of what appers to be a section of frill down the center of the skull, I am willing to say that it may be a new species. For such a large animal, one would expect the brow horn, the ones over the eyes, to be as much as 48 inches. This one is only 12 inches. But the nose horn is almost 12 inches which would be the right length for this size of skull. We will publish a sketch I did of it to get an idea of what it may turn out to look like.